Dear Commission, I agree with some of the other people that feel you have neglected to include some key Fleetwood locations in Fleetwood. My wife and I live in the eastern portion of Fleetwood that you have now placed into Cloverdale.
Your suggested eastern boundary of 160ST effectively cuts Fleetwood in half.
I can only surmise that in your decision making you made numbers a priority over communities, this is a mistake and contrary to your mandate.
Then, it seems that as a result of cutting off the eastern portion of Fleetwood and its population, you are now suggesting adding back in numbers from Newton and Tynehead.
It seems that by looking at this project from a simply numbers point of view, you are about to effectively redefine three local communities.
Why not keep it simple? Retain Fleetwood as much as possible up to your allowable limit of 66,000+ this will keep our community together and you are still working within your allowable population limits.
Fleetwood will not be growing as much as the area's in south Surrey Morgan Heights area, We should be fine on the high end of your limits. I would prefer that and keep Fleetwood whole and certainly before you add in numbers from Newton or Tynehead.